This weekend we attended the Seattle Adventure Running Tournament (SART) in, you guessed it, Seattle! This race series is unique as it is a bracketed tournament in which throughout six different races on five maps, participants move up or down in brackets (and thus possible final results). Each heat this weekend was composed of five athletes who would race together in a mass start. Each heat also had a partner heat who were competing for the top five spots after every race. This year, the first person in each heat automatically advanced to the next bracket along with the three fastest times out of both heats. Ultimately you needed to be in the top half of both heats to advance! This resulted in the 77 people getting split up into top half and bottom half after the first race, then groups of 20, 10, and then battles pursued for positions within a heat of 5 for the final race.
Here is a link to the very interesting
pdf of the final bracket.
|
After each race, participants got colour-coded stickers indicating their next bracket and start time |
The weekend began with a time trial at Gas Works park. This was a very short race but in interesting terrain! Overhead pipes and large industrial machinery composed a technical section of the map. The time trial was used to seed people into heats for the first race. Seeding was done in a way to spread the field and ensure the fastest people would meet only in the semi-final and final. However, all races were competitive and things heated up quickly within the brackets!
|
Our 6th control was on the one of these structures |
The first mass start race was at Woodland park, a longer course through open forest, fields, and sporting areas. This race secured both of us (Emma and Nicole) positions in the top half of the field. After an eventful morning and a short lunch break post-race, we headed out to Carkeek park - the location of the second mass start race. This race was a big contrast to the previous two as it was a forested, hilly course involving mainly trail running! With limited route choice, physical fitness was key to success. There was more head to head competition in this race as brackets brought people of similar abilities together. At this point the beautiful, sunny (and warm!) weather combined with physical fatigue posed a challenge, but we still had to
carry on to the final race of the day on the small but very technical Seattle Pacific University map. This race proved extremely tricky with lots of traps, climb to consider with route choice, and out of bounds areas. There was separation at this point between runners and those who were navigationally competent. Two copies of the map were needed for clarity in the small but technical area. A lot of discussion occurred over ideal route choices; for example, what would you do from 17 to 18?
Here is a link to the pdf of the SPU map, so you can look at the other route choices and traps. Control descriptions were a necessity, notably on the first control.
At the end of a tiring day we were able to share dinner with athletes from four nations! This included a large Canadian contingent and was a great time for all!
The next day, getting out of bed was a challenge as everyone's body's were
just a little sore... nonetheless, because us orienteerers are crazy, we headed out to the fifth race at the picturesque University of Washington campus. Day 2 had limited movement within brackets as we were fighting for placement within a group of 10. However, at this point speeds were more or less matched within heats it was very competitive! The campus is quite large with buildings at interesting angles, green space, a fountain with its own geotag on snapchat (!) and the opportunity for lots of route choice.
|
A technical section of the first race on Sunday |
The course was quite fun with a mixture of short technical sections and long route choice legs in between. There were some challenging sections with lots of staircases, walls and even a bridge that played into decisions. Most people at this point were feeling physically drained but had to pull it together for the final race determining positions within your heat of 5. We only had a short break of about an hour in between races to prepare for the looped final race. It was still a mass start for the final race; however, it had three different loops and arrangements meaning that you were running alone! This required a different mentality than the rest of the weekend as you no longer knew where your competition was at each point in the race. This was a good test of navigational ability, physical perseverance, mental toughness, and being able to push your speed while alone and exhausted.
|
One of the many interesting buildings on the University of Washington campus |
It was exciting to watch everyone come in as the fastest heats started last. There were many Canadian HPP members in the top heats, including both Adam and Graeme in the hunt for the win. They finished with a very impressive 3rd and 4th, respectively. With lots of good competition all around, we (Emma and Nicole) came in 3rd and 5th female, or 18th and 23rd overall.
We learned the importance of being well rested physically before races in order to do the best possible, and that navigational ability cannot always make up the difference of speedy running. All in all it was a really fun and challenging weekend with great races and weather. We couldn't ask for anything more! Thank you so much to the organizer, Patrick Nuss, and all the volunteers. Looking forward to next year!
-Nicole and Emma S.